<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last One to the Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/</link>
	<description>random and occassionally coherent musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rob - OS X has definitely come a long way from the days when &quot;What OS 9 feature do you want in OS X&quot; could be answered by saying something like &quot;CD Burning.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thinking about it, I&#039;d like to see an updated implementation of Publish and Subscribe at the OS level. We&#039;ve got a third party solution in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkbackproject.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LinkBack&lt;/a&gt;, but I think there&#039;d be more developer support if such a tech was standardized in the OS. Perhaps mix in some Time Machine support so you could choose between different revisions of the linked item.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; OS X has definitely come a long way from the days when &#8220;What OS 9 feature do you want in OS X&#8221; could be answered by saying something like &#8220;CD Burning.&#8221;</p>

<p>Thinking about it, I&#8217;d like to see an updated implementation of Publish and Subscribe at the OS level. We&#8217;ve got a third party solution in <a href="http://www.linkbackproject.org/" rel="nofollow">LinkBack</a>, but I think there&#8217;d be more developer support if such a tech was standardized in the OS. Perhaps mix in some Time Machine support so you could choose between different revisions of the linked item.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob colonna</title>
		<link>http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>rob colonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;to be fair, the data detectors used to be a fairly obscure free download for the classic os 8 and 9, if i remember correctly; very cool stuff at the time, but not something a lot of people used.  i still wouldn&#039;t mind having a fully-customizable apple menu again, or windowshade.  maybe with a really elaborate animated rolling-up.  that&#039;s what&#039;s so amazing about os x today, and perhaps even more so, the iphone.  all these little nuggets of stuff that they&#039;ve done since 1995, all still there, mixed in in such a way to make you think they finally found a  good home for all the random good stuff they&#039;ve done.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be fair, the data detectors used to be a fairly obscure free download for the classic os 8 and 9, if i remember correctly; very cool stuff at the time, but not something a lot of people used.  i still wouldn&#8217;t mind having a fully-customizable apple menu again, or windowshade.  maybe with a really elaborate animated rolling-up.  that&#8217;s what&#8217;s so amazing about os x today, and perhaps even more so, the iphone.  all these little nuggets of stuff that they&#8217;ve done since 1995, all still there, mixed in in such a way to make you think they finally found a  good home for all the random good stuff they&#8217;ve done.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raoli.com/2007/10/25/last-one-to-the-party/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s hilarious!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Actually, there&#039;s &quot;feature in Mac OS X that&#039;s most like a feature that was underimplemented in OS 9 or earlier&quot;: software base station. They keep moving it around. Now it&#039;s in a different tab in Leopard, but Internet sharing is still unable to use WPA encryption or 128-bit WEP, and other aspects are poor, too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hilarious!</p>

<p>Actually, there&#8217;s &#8220;feature in Mac OS X that&#8217;s most like a feature that was underimplemented in OS 9 or earlier&#8221;: software base station. They keep moving it around. Now it&#8217;s in a different tab in Leopard, but Internet sharing is still unable to use WPA encryption or 128-bit WEP, and other aspects are poor, too.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.220 seconds -->

