Comments on: Yojimbo 1.0 http://raoli.com/2006/01/23/yojimbo-10/ random and occassionally coherent musings Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:38:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Eric http://raoli.com/2006/01/23/yojimbo-10/comment-page-1/#comment-242 Eric Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:40:11 +0000 http://www.raoli.com/?p=281#comment-242 <p>No problem with self-promotion, as long as its relevant. Heck, I think we have a few courses devoted to the art in the b-school :)</p> <p>Honestly, from what I've read about BibDesk on your site, I wouldn't have connected it with what I'm using Yojimbo for - I was thinking it was more a tool more for creating bibliographies as opposed to tracking full documents.</p> No problem with self-promotion, as long as its relevant. Heck, I think we have a few courses devoted to the art in the b-school :)

Honestly, from what I’ve read about BibDesk on your site, I wouldn’t have connected it with what I’m using Yojimbo for – I was thinking it was more a tool more for creating bibliographies as opposed to tracking full documents.

]]> By: Michael McCracken http://raoli.com/2006/01/23/yojimbo-10/comment-page-1/#comment-241 Michael McCracken Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:28:08 +0000 http://www.raoli.com/?p=281#comment-241 <p>Apologies for the self-promotion, but if you're looking for an app that helps keep track of academic PDFs and web pages, and don't mind the LaTeX/BibTeX heritage, BibDesk (http://bibdesk.sf.net) might be worth a look - that's what we wrote it for.</p> <p>I also think Yojimbo's strongest point is its support (largely leveraging OS X's native support) for lots of content types, web pages, word docs, PDFs, etc.</p> Apologies for the self-promotion, but if you’re looking for an app that helps keep track of academic PDFs and web pages, and don’t mind the LaTeX/BibTeX heritage, BibDesk (http://bibdesk.sf.net) might be worth a look – that’s what we wrote it for.

I also think Yojimbo’s strongest point is its support (largely leveraging OS X’s native support) for lots of content types, web pages, word docs, PDFs, etc.

]]> By: Eric http://raoli.com/2006/01/23/yojimbo-10/comment-page-1/#comment-240 Eric Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:37:42 +0000 http://www.raoli.com/?p=281#comment-240 <p>g is backwards compatible with b. That's one of of the big selling points. However, most APs let you select which modes are active. It appears that whoever's responsible for maintaining the network has disabled b access. I put in a help ticket with support, but they directed me to somebody else and I haven't had time to run down the appropriate people.</p> <p>Check the Airport Admin Utility for your Airport Express - it's the Mode popup menu.</p> <p>I tested out this hypothesis with my Dell by switching the mode on the wireless card - when I was in auto-detect or g-only mode, I could connect to the network; when I was in b-only mode it was no-go.</p> g is backwards compatible with b. That’s one of of the big selling points. However, most APs let you select which modes are active. It appears that whoever’s responsible for maintaining the network has disabled b access. I put in a help ticket with support, but they directed me to somebody else and I haven’t had time to run down the appropriate people.

Check the Airport Admin Utility for your Airport Express – it’s the Mode popup menu.

I tested out this hypothesis with my Dell by switching the mode on the wireless card – when I was in auto-detect or g-only mode, I could connect to the network; when I was in b-only mode it was no-go.

]]> By: David Siebecker http://raoli.com/2006/01/23/yojimbo-10/comment-page-1/#comment-239 David Siebecker Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:15:06 +0000 http://www.raoli.com/?p=281#comment-239 <p>I thought that g was backwards compatible with b. Are they running an a network?</p> I thought that g was backwards compatible with b. Are they running an a network?

]]>