<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digitial (Camera) Replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raoli.com/2003/08/04/digitial-camera-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raoli.com/2003/08/04/digitial-camera-replacement/</link>
	<description>random and occassionally coherent musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Andersen</title>
		<link>http://raoli.com/2003/08/04/digitial-camera-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raoli.com/?p=116#comment-107</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to be a Nikon loyalist when it came to digcams, but I&#039;ve more or less switched to Canon.  My plan is to eventually purchase a Canon EOS-10D (or whatever replaces it), but I also wanted a nice, inexpensive camera now to document my move to California, so I bought a $300 Canon PowerShot A70.  Something about that camera just feels good to me--the ergonomics, the interface, the metal case (as opposed to the cheesy plastic Nikon has moved to).  It also seems to me that it does a decent job in low light, which is more than I can say for most digicams (although I have to admit my evidence of that is strictly anecdotal).  And you&#039;re absolutely right that people on the web seem to gush about their Canons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the A70s are difficult to come by right now (production problems, I&#039;m told).  I ordered mine through Amazon.com (which was actually J&amp;R), and I&#039;m keeping my fingers crossed that I will get it before I leave...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a Nikon loyalist when it came to digcams, but I&#8217;ve more or less switched to Canon.  My plan is to eventually purchase a Canon EOS-10D (or whatever replaces it), but I also wanted a nice, inexpensive camera now to document my move to California, so I bought a $300 Canon PowerShot A70.  Something about that camera just feels good to me&#8211;the ergonomics, the interface, the metal case (as opposed to the cheesy plastic Nikon has moved to).  It also seems to me that it does a decent job in low light, which is more than I can say for most digicams (although I have to admit my evidence of that is strictly anecdotal).  And you&#8217;re absolutely right that people on the web seem to gush about their Canons.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, the A70s are difficult to come by right now (production problems, I&#8217;m told).  I ordered mine through Amazon.com (which was actually J&amp;R), and I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed that I will get it before I leave&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.163 seconds -->

